|
Product Stability -- Entertainment Unit

|
Mr. and Mrs. AB had recently moved into their new home and had purchased
an entertainment unit. The unit was delivered on casters, which
were attached to the bottom of the unit by the manufacturer. It
was the manufacturer's intent that the casters would be removed
once the unit was delivered. In this instance, delivery personnel
did not remove the casters.
Mr. AB loaded the unit with a large TV, a stereo system, a VCR,
tapes and CDs. Mr. and Mrs. AB had two children, the youngest was
a four-year-old boy. The bottom drawer of the unit held his videotapes.
All the other tapes and CD's were placed on the top shelf.
|
|
The child asked his mother whether he could use the VCR. She gave
him her permission and he went downstairs to the living room. A
short time later, a loud noise was heard. The entertainment unit
had toppled over onto the child. He was killed. There were no witnesses
to the accident.
|
|
|
HF Issues: Under what conditions would the unit topple?
Could the accident have been reasonably anticipated? Would the accident
have occurred if the unit was not on casters? What safety information
should have accompanied the unit?
HF Investigation: Information included, but was not limited
to: the height and weight of the child; the dimensions, center of
mass, and weight of the entertainment unit; the dimensions, center
of mass, and weight of the TV; the dimensions and weight of the
VCR and stereo; the dimensions, number, and combined weight of the
tapes stored in the bottom drawer; the dimensions, number, and combined
weight of the tapes stored on the top shelf; the autopsy report;
the police report, the depositions of the parents; the manufacturer,
the distributor, and other parties. The floor, which was ceramic
tile, was examined to determine if was level.
|
| HF Analysis: The research hypothesis
was that the child either wanted a tape or CD that was stored on the
unit's top shelf or wanted to see what was on the top shelf. In order
to do so, he had to climb the unit. |
|
| This task was facilitated by the location of the unit's
two drawers, which could be slid opened, mounted, and then climbed
upon. Under these circumstances, the unit was at greatest risk of
toppling when the bottom drawer supported the child's full weight
and his center of mass was furthest from the fulcrum. This would occur
if the child mounted the bottom drawer when it was pulled fully open.
|
|
|
To test whether the unit would topple under the described conditions,
a model of the child and entertainment unit were created using Working
Model 2.0 (Knowledge Revolution). Estimates for the mass of the
child's various body segments were obtained using two sources: GeoBod/Mac
(Marpet, M. I., Saint John's University) and HumanCad (Biomechanics
Corporation of America). Three caster conditions were simulated:
No Casters, Casters in Push Back orientation, Casters in Pull Forward
orientation.
|
RESULTS - NO CASTERS:


|
| |
|
RESULTS - CASTERS, PUSH BACK:


|
|
|
|
RESULTS - CASTERS, PULL:


|
|
The results of the simulations indicated that casters
compromised the stability of the unit, especially under the condition
where they were oriented in the "Pull Forward" position. Under this
condition, the fulcrum provided by the front coaster(s ) was furthest
from the child's center of gravity, and consequently it was associated
with the greatest torque. Further, the simulations indicated that
the entertainment unit would not have toppled if the casters had
been removed .
Several factors were of consequence in this accident.
The TV was large, heavy, and its center of gravity was several inches
forward of its geometric center towards the screen. In turn, with
placement of the TV onto the unit, the gravitational line (vertical
projection drawn through center of gravity) of the composite system
was displaced forward, decreasing its stability.
|
| The top shelf was out of reach of young children, unless
the child climbed upon the unit. The two bottom drawers provided a
means of scaling the unit. |
 |
| The purpose of the casters was to facilitate delivery
of the entertainment unit. It was the manufacturer's intent that the
casters would be removed by delivery personnel. Therefore, a warning
should have been provided that would have alerted and/or reminded
delivery personnel that the unit could tip over and injure someone
unless the casters were removed. |
 |
| The warning should have been affixed to
the unit at a location where it would have been conspicuous not only
to delivery personnel but to the end user. |
|
|
|
2934
Steamboat Island NW
Olympia,
WA 98502
www.gdsloan.com
|
|
|
This
material may be used freely provided you
reference this source:
G. David Sloan Inc., 1999, www.gdsloan.com, Olympia, WA, USA
|
Site
design by Alex Gheorghiu, Chuck Mathison & Pam Johnson
Olympia, WA
|
|
|
|